Urban Chef



  1. "When you call yourself an Indian or a Muslim or a Christian or a European, or anything else, you are being violent. Do you see why it is violent? Because you are separating yourself from the rest of mankind. When you separate yourself by belief, by nationality, by tradition, it breeds violence. So a man who is seeking to understand violence does not belong to any country, to any religion, to any political party or partial system; he is concerned with the total understanding of mankind."
    — Jiddu Krishnamurti
     

  2. mellro:

    misandry-mermaid:

    This series is BRILLANT.  And all made by the same woman.

    AMAZING

    (via rockitdarlin)

     

  3. weaselwoman:

    ivorysorrows:

    lil-miss-choc:

    bonerack:

    princessnecrophilia:

    weeaboo-chan:

    vhscars:

    protest-resources:

    50 Shades of Abuse Flyer - Canada

    Use, redistribute, print. 

    Click image and magnify for large version.

    Okay. I understood all the flack Twilight got for being an abusive relationship. Because it was and it was being read by a very young and impressionable audience. But ffs, 50 Shades is an ADULT NOVEL. Iit is about a BDSM couple. Which - newsflash - do exist. It is a completely consensual form of dominate/submissive sex play. The whole concept of domestic violence and abuse is that one side exerts control over an unwilling victim. I don’t recall Anastasia, or whatever she’s called, protesting to Christian’s form of sex. If I remember correctly, she quite enjoyed it! So before you condemn a work of romanticizedfiction, actually consider it’s audience and remember that they are mature and capable enough to know the difference between reality and fiction.

    so i guess you didn’t read the parts where he coerces her and the part where he continues after she has used her safeword and acts like a fucking creep whenever they aren’t having sex

    it is the worst possible introduction to BDSM i could imagine

    i know my shit okay

    im hoping the people defending this book are 1. never getting into BDSM 2. not currently into BDSM 3. havent read the book bc i dont want to believe anyone is that fucking stupid

    Let me

    just

    fucking

    drop

    some fucking

    knowledge on you right now.

    Wanna know the BDSM mantra? Safe, sane, consensual.

    So let me explain why this book was devoid of all three of these things.

    Safe - In the first few chapters of the novel, Christian Grey tracks Ana’s cell phone to find her at a club. Takes her home when she’s drunk, changes her when she’s so intoxicated she doesn’t remember him doing so,and informs her he will be keeping tabs on her for her own benefit. This is not the behaviour of a respectable Dominant. This is the behaviour of a power hungry, abusive asshole who really can’t take no for an answer.

    Sane - One of the most important parts of BDSM is aftercare. Scenes can be extremely traumatizing and intense for the submissive. Aftercare is anything from petting to cuddling to holding to sweet talking, whatever degree of gentleness a bottom would need to pull them out of “subspace”. How does Christian provide aftercare? He submits Ana to a traumatizing first time spanking experience AND THEN FUCKING LEAVES. AND GETS MAD THAT SHE DIDN’T TELL HIM SHE WAS UPSET. He’s the one who should fucking know better! That, again, is not the act of a responsible Dominant. It’s the act of a selfish abuser.

    Consensual - Did I mention he undressed her when she was belligerently drunk? Tracked her phone to locate her? He also buys her a new car despite her saying no countless times. Now, consent is important for any kind of sexual activity at all. Consent means informed, consent means enthusiastic. Informed, enthusiastic consent. This is crucial in a BDSM setting. Scenes can be extremely intense, especially for the bottom. What is Christian’s form of obtaining consent? Handing Ana a fucking contract highlighting all the things he wants to do her asshole and asking her to sign it. She was a virgin (Don’t even get me fucking started.) who had never before been exposed to BDSM. Entering in that kind of relationship takes a gargantuan amount of trust and knowledge so you know exactly what you’re getting into. Not reading a list of kinks on a piece of paper and signing your rights to say no away. Christian didn’t offer her resources, he didn’t offer her information. He gave her an ultimatum. That is not the sort of consent a responsible Dom/me would seek from their submissive.

    Fuck. This. book. It’s written in a shitty way, it’s a terrible example of a BDSM relationship (ask anybody already involved in the lifestyle and watch them go blue in the face just thinking about it), which is already faced with enough prejudice and misunderstand, and it romanticizes and glorifies abuse.

    And this post is going into my bookmarks, because it is beautiful.

    What scares me most is the fact that people, misinformed and ignorant people, will now try to enter the community/find play partners with the dangerous ideas of what BDSM is. They won’t respect a sub, they won’t listen.

    And that can seriously hurt people. People can DIE.

    One of the many reasons why I despise this book with a passion. 

     

  4. Burger time.

     

  5. lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    Kiyomi’s dinner of pinto beans & quinoa with Vegedog™ supplement & a dash of garlic. Going to mix in a bit of Natural Balance vegan formula kibble for added crunch.

    If by spoiled you mean abused.

    Oh, muck your fother.

    This was not “abuse.” (She is not vegan anymore, not that you care). This was not some kid vivisecting a black cat on Halloween or kicking their dog in the ribs out of anger. This was someone carefully formulated vegan wet food & AAFCO certified vegan kibbles under veterinary supervision, and the moment I sensed it wasn’t working out, I brought animal products back into her diet. Again, she has never been, nor will ever be “abused.”

    In fact, to say she was, is insulting all the victims of *actual* animal abuse - like idk - the kind people pay to have on their plates every night.

    You should be ashamed of your ridiculous hyperbole.

    Neglect is a form of abuse. Ignorance does not excuse it.

    Nor was she “neglected.” LOL why are you still talking?

    Go do something productive kiddo

    Um, yeah. Failing to provide for your dog is neglect. And just because there are more extreme cases of abuse doesn’t in any way minimize this form of it.

    I did not fail to provide for her either, so, you still have no point

    This is getting awkward

    You failed to provide a species appropriate diet that your dog could be healthy on.

    Except, no, I didn’t - she’s not vegan anymore. And she was fit as a fiddle on her vegan diet for 6 months according to her blood tests - I only brought animal products back into her diet after I noticed her coat getting dull.

    Again, when you call a person who fed a vet-approved vegan diet to their dog with no ill effects & who quit it the moment he sensed it wasn’t good for her BEFORE she developed any nutritional deficiencies an “animal abuser,” you diminish the seriousness of the label.

    Now, if I was still feeding my dog vegan kibbles, after noticing her coat getting dull & after getting blood tests that revealed nutritional deficiencies, I would say you would have every right right to call me an animal abuser.

    But I’m not & you don’t.

    Actually I have this thing called freedom of speech and I have the right to call you whatever I want (:

    Ah, OK, so, because you *can* call someone something, you should

    I had a suspicion I was talking to a child, and you just confirmed it

    Now fuck off my blog.

    It’s typical for people who can’t defend their position to try and attack the other person’s character. In the other comments on this you talk about how its basically the people who don’t support a vegan diet for dogs because the information about why it’s bad supposedly isn’t available enough. If you really think that why are you sill trying to defend what you did as healthy and safe for your dog? Do you want other people to make that same mistake?l

    “It’s typical for people who can’t defend their position to try and attack the other person’s character.”

    Oh, like you attacked my character to begin with by calling me an “animal abuser?” That’s because you never had a defensible “position”in the first place.

    Going around tumblr & calling people who have vegan dogs “animal abusers” without presenting a well-reasoned argument explaining why their dogs are “abused,” does not make you a hero.

    It makes you a coward who (apparently) lacks the ability to make well reasoned arguments.

    I said feeding a carnivore a vegan diet is abuse. Just as trying to feed a rabbit animal products would be abuse. I have not actually called you an animal abuser. I have said that something you did constitutes abuse but their is a difference. In any case I’m not going to try to further reason with someone who uses the anon function to troll.

    I don’t use the anon function to troll, you’re probably just getting hate because you’re that unlikable, and by now, everyone can see that the only objective you ever had here was to start shit. Good bye & good riddance.
     

  6. 50shadesofkomaeda:

    urbancheff:

    Kiyomi’s dinner of pinto beans & quinoa with Vegedog™ supplement & a dash of garlic. Going to mix in a bit of Natural Balance vegan formula kibble for added crunch.

    Please, get a hamster, or rabbit, or bird, or anything but a animal that cannot live a healthy life without the amino acids only provided by animal meat

    She’s not vegan anymore, but there are actually plant-based sources for every single amino acid a dog (or human) could ever need, so yeah, maybe learn more about nutrition

     

  7. lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    Kiyomi’s dinner of pinto beans & quinoa with Vegedog™ supplement & a dash of garlic. Going to mix in a bit of Natural Balance vegan formula kibble for added crunch.

    If by spoiled you mean abused.

    Oh, muck your fother.

    This was not “abuse.” (She is not vegan anymore, not that you care). This was not some kid vivisecting a black cat on Halloween or kicking their dog in the ribs out of anger. This was someone carefully formulated vegan wet food & AAFCO certified vegan kibbles under veterinary supervision, and the moment I sensed it wasn’t working out, I brought animal products back into her diet. Again, she has never been, nor will ever be “abused.”

    In fact, to say she was, is insulting all the victims of *actual* animal abuse - like idk - the kind people pay to have on their plates every night.

    You should be ashamed of your ridiculous hyperbole.

    Neglect is a form of abuse. Ignorance does not excuse it.

    Nor was she “neglected.” LOL why are you still talking?

    Go do something productive kiddo

    Um, yeah. Failing to provide for your dog is neglect. And just because there are more extreme cases of abuse doesn’t in any way minimize this form of it.

    I did not fail to provide for her either, so, you still have no point

    This is getting awkward

    You failed to provide a species appropriate diet that your dog could be healthy on.

    Except, no, I didn’t - she’s not vegan anymore. And she was fit as a fiddle on her vegan diet for 6 months according to her blood tests - I only brought animal products back into her diet after I noticed her coat getting dull.

    Again, when you call a person who fed a vet-approved vegan diet to their dog with no ill effects & who quit it the moment he sensed it wasn’t good for her BEFORE she developed any nutritional deficiencies an “animal abuser,” you diminish the seriousness of the label.

    Now, if I was still feeding my dog vegan kibbles, after noticing her coat getting dull & after getting blood tests that revealed nutritional deficiencies, I would say you would have every right right to call me an animal abuser.

    But I’m not & you don’t.

    Actually I have this thing called freedom of speech and I have the right to call you whatever I want (:

    Ah, OK, so, because you *can* call someone something, you should

    I had a suspicion I was talking to a child, and you just confirmed it

    Now fuck off my blog.

    It’s typical for people who can’t defend their position to try and attack the other person’s character. In the other comments on this you talk about how its basically the people who don’t support a vegan diet for dogs because the information about why it’s bad supposedly isn’t available enough. If you really think that why are you sill trying to defend what you did as healthy and safe for your dog? Do you want other people to make that same mistake?l

    “It’s typical for people who can’t defend their position to try and attack the other person’s character.”

    Oh, like you attacked my character to begin with by calling me an “animal abuser?” That’s because you never had a defensible “position”in the first place.

    Going around tumblr & calling people who have vegan dogs “animal abusers” without presenting a well-reasoned argument explaining why their dogs are “abused,” does not make you a hero.

    It makes you a coward who (apparently) lacks the ability to make well reasoned arguments.
     

  8. lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    Kiyomi’s dinner of pinto beans & quinoa with Vegedog™ supplement & a dash of garlic. Going to mix in a bit of Natural Balance vegan formula kibble for added crunch.

    If by spoiled you mean abused.

    Oh, muck your fother.

    This was not “abuse.” (She is not vegan anymore, not that you care). This was not some kid vivisecting a black cat on Halloween or kicking their dog in the ribs out of anger. This was someone carefully formulated vegan wet food & AAFCO certified vegan kibbles under veterinary supervision, and the moment I sensed it wasn’t working out, I brought animal products back into her diet. Again, she has never been, nor will ever be “abused.”

    In fact, to say she was, is insulting all the victims of *actual* animal abuse - like idk - the kind people pay to have on their plates every night.

    You should be ashamed of your ridiculous hyperbole.

    Neglect is a form of abuse. Ignorance does not excuse it.

    Nor was she “neglected.” LOL why are you still talking?

    Go do something productive kiddo

    Um, yeah. Failing to provide for your dog is neglect. And just because there are more extreme cases of abuse doesn’t in any way minimize this form of it.

    I did not fail to provide for her either, so, you still have no point

    This is getting awkward

    You failed to provide a species appropriate diet that your dog could be healthy on.

    Except, no, I didn’t - she’s not vegan anymore. And she was fit as a fiddle on her vegan diet for 6 months according to her blood tests - I only brought animal products back into her diet after I noticed her coat getting dull.

    Again, when you call a person who fed a vet-approved vegan diet to their dog with no ill effects & who quit it the moment he sensed it wasn’t good for her BEFORE she developed any nutritional deficiencies an “animal abuser,” you diminish the seriousness of the label.

    Now, if I was still feeding my dog vegan kibbles, after noticing her coat getting dull & after getting blood tests that revealed nutritional deficiencies, I would say you would have every right right to call me an animal abuser.

    But I’m not & you don’t.

    Actually I have this thing called freedom of speech and I have the right to call you whatever I want (:

    Ah, OK, so, because you *can* call someone something, you should

    I had a suspicion I was talking to a child, and you just confirmed it

    Now fuck off my blog.
     

  9. lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    Kiyomi’s dinner of pinto beans & quinoa with Vegedog™ supplement & a dash of garlic. Going to mix in a bit of Natural Balance vegan formula kibble for added crunch.

    If by spoiled you mean abused.

    Oh, muck your fother.

    This was not “abuse.” (She is not vegan anymore, not that you care). This was not some kid vivisecting a black cat on Halloween or kicking their dog in the ribs out of anger. This was someone carefully formulated vegan wet food & AAFCO certified vegan kibbles under veterinary supervision, and the moment I sensed it wasn’t working out, I brought animal products back into her diet. Again, she has never been, nor will ever be “abused.”

    In fact, to say she was, is insulting all the victims of *actual* animal abuse - like idk - the kind people pay to have on their plates every night.

    You should be ashamed of your ridiculous hyperbole.

    Neglect is a form of abuse. Ignorance does not excuse it.

    Nor was she “neglected.” LOL why are you still talking?

    Go do something productive kiddo

    Um, yeah. Failing to provide for your dog is neglect. And just because there are more extreme cases of abuse doesn’t in any way minimize this form of it.

    I did not fail to provide for her either, so, you still have no point

    This is getting awkward

    You failed to provide a species appropriate diet that your dog could be healthy on.

    Except, no, I didn’t - she’s not vegan anymore. And she was fit as a fiddle on her vegan diet for 6 months according to her blood tests - I only brought animal products back into her diet after I noticed her coat getting dull.

    Again, when you call a person who fed a vet-approved vegan diet to their dog with no ill effects & who quit it the moment he sensed it wasn’t good for her BEFORE she developed any nutritional deficiencies an “animal abuser,” you diminish the seriousness of the label.

    Now, if I was still feeding my dog vegan kibbles, after noticing her coat getting dull & after getting blood tests that revealed nutritional deficiencies, I would say you would have every right right to call me an animal abuser.

    But I’m not & you don’t.

     

  10. lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    lesbianfightclub:

    urbancheff:

    Kiyomi’s dinner of pinto beans & quinoa with Vegedog™ supplement & a dash of garlic. Going to mix in a bit of Natural Balance vegan formula kibble for added crunch.

    If by spoiled you mean abused.

    Oh, muck your fother.

    This was not “abuse.” (She is not vegan anymore, not that you care). This was not some kid vivisecting a black cat on Halloween or kicking their dog in the ribs out of anger. This was someone carefully formulated vegan wet food & AAFCO certified vegan kibbles under veterinary supervision, and the moment I sensed it wasn’t working out, I brought animal products back into her diet. Again, she has never been, nor will ever be “abused.”

    In fact, to say she was, is insulting all the victims of *actual* animal abuse - like idk - the kind people pay to have on their plates every night.

    You should be ashamed of your ridiculous hyperbole.

    Neglect is a form of abuse. Ignorance does not excuse it.

    Nor was she “neglected.” LOL why are you still talking?

    Go do something productive kiddo

    Um, yeah. Failing to provide for your dog is neglect. And just because there are more extreme cases of abuse doesn’t in any way minimize this form of it.

    I did not fail to provide for her either, so, you still have no point

    This is getting awkward